What role has in-betweenness played since 2000s? In Turkey and Indonesia’s bilateral relations with the EU and Japan respectively
A working paper authored by Jing-syuan exploring the notion of "in-betweenness" a central concept of her individual research project.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Theoretical framework: Classical Realism and Analytical Eclecticism
- The Ambiguities of the EU’s Promotion of Democracy, Human Rights, and the Rule of Law in its international relations: the case of Turkey
- Normative Power Europe: lighthouse keeper of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law?
- The case of Turkey: rugged road to Europe
- Relations between Japan and Indonesia
- Turkey and Indonesia’s in-betweenness compared: linkage between domestic diverse identities and external balancing acts.
- Definition of In-betweenness
- Change and Continuities of Turkish in-between: from Kemalist-western modernization to neo-Ottoman foreign policy, promoting multipolarity while advancing Islamic ideologies
- Continuity of Indonesian in-between: pragmatism and balance of power
- Comparison between Turkish and Indonesian in-between
- Operationalization of in-betweenness in comparison: level of analysis
- Conclusion and Limitation
- Bibliography
- Appendix